Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue 103 #290

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 5, 2013
Merged

Issue 103 #290

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 5, 2013

Conversation

abersnaze
Copy link
Contributor

Adding the zip operator that works on collection of Observables and a FuncN.

#103

@cloudbees-pull-request-builder

RxJava-pull-requests #164 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good

@cloudbees-pull-request-builder

RxJava-pull-requests #168 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good

@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member

So is the idea here that someone will use this with ? or Object types and it will up to them to handle the typing of the arguments passed in rather than having overloads for all possible arities (ie T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 ... Tn)?

@abersnaze
Copy link
Contributor Author

It doesn't prevent us from adding them and maintaining type safety for more situations. Type safety is also lost when use zip(Observable<Observable<?>>, FuncN)

benjchristensen added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2013
@benjchristensen benjchristensen merged commit c9f2c13 into ReactiveX:master Jul 5, 2013
rickbw pushed a commit to rickbw/RxJava that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants