Add Httpheader argument in executeAndExtractJsonPathAsObject

[samhon]

Pull request checklist

• Please read our contributor guide
• Consider creating a discussion on the discussion forum
  first
• Make sure the PR doesn't introduce backward compatibility issues
• Make sure to have sufficient test cases

Pull Request type

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• Build related changes
• Other (please describe):

Changes in this PR

We have HttpHeaders in executeAndExtractJsonPath, but doesn't in executeAndExtractJsonPathAsObject. Therefore, make executeAndExtractJsonPathAsObject take the HttpHeaders in the arguments.

Describe the new behavior from this PR, and why it's needed
Issue #

This is helpful when we writing the Unit Test with header values. One example is the auth token in the header. Without this PR, we need to do something like

HttpHeaders httpHeaders = new HttpHeaders();
    httpHeaders.add("Authorization", formatAuthorizationToken(loginUser.getToken()));

    Object executorResult =
        dgsQueryExecutor.executeAndExtractJsonPath(
            graphQLQueryRequest.serialize(), "data.login", httpHeaders);

    LoginUser registerUser = objectMapper.convertValue(executorResult, LoginUser.class);

With this PR, we can do it in just one line

HttpHeaders httpHeaders = new HttpHeaders();
    httpHeaders.add("Authorization", formatAuthorizationToken(loginUser.getToken()));

    LoginUser registerUser = dgsQueryExecutor.executeAndExtractJsonPathAsObject(
            graphQLQueryRequest.serialize(), "data.login", httpHeaders, LoginUser.class);

Alternatives considered

Describe alternative implementation you have considered
No

[berngp]

Thanks for the PR, I have a minor style request regarding the position of the header argument.

[berngp]

The position of the header argument is not consistent with other methods in the class. Could we add it as the last argument please.

• here
• and here

I consider this here as an anomaly in the style.

[samhon]

Thanks for the review. I addressed the comments and add some unit tests. Please take another look. Thanks.