You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I did not have the impression that these qualify as separate "devices", as all of them are either re-branded from existing upstream devices (nitropc) or from the dasharo repo (nitrowall/nitrowall pro). In detail these are more or less pre-configured with the biggest change being the PL1+2 for one of them inside the devicetree.cb.
Am I judging this wrong? Would this qualify for new devices on coreboot upstream?
In detail these are more or less pre-configured with the biggest change being the PL1+2 for one of them inside the devicetree.cb.
Can you elaborate please?
Am I judging this wrong? Would this qualify for new devices on coreboot upstream?
At least it would qualify as a variant. If it’s just rebranding, then it’d be great, if the name NitroPC would show up in the documentation and Kconfig description. The goal should be, that the firmware for a device can be easily built from the upstream sources with the upstream build system.
It’d be great, if you upstreamed the devices to the coreboot project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: