New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove without_storage_info for the poa pallet - V2 #633
Conversation
Signed-off-by: R.Rajeshkumar <rajesh@nodle.com>
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #633 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.74% 89.73% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 33 33
Lines 6238 6232 -6
==========================================
- Hits 5598 5592 -6
Misses 640 640
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Signed-off-by: R.Rajeshkumar <rajesh@nodle.com>
…chain into shamb0/v2_bounded_poa
pallets/staking/src/lib.rs
Outdated
@@ -34,7 +34,10 @@ pub mod weights; | |||
|
|||
use frame_support::pallet; | |||
pub(crate) mod hooks; | |||
mod migrations; | |||
|
|||
// TODO:: Take it part of PR621 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this TODO
still outstanding?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suppose it needs to be pulled in as part of #621?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup, has to be taken care part of #621
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it possible that we don't make any changes to this file as part of this PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, right now not possible, mainly due to the requirements of moving validatorsets from pallet members to invulnerables storage.
A few questions, but otherwise LGTM. If this PR should be merged in a certain order (relating to other work that is currently in-flight), that would be helpful to know for future reference. |
Signed-off-by: R.Rajeshkumar <rajesh@nodle.com>
Signed-off-by: R.Rajeshkumar <rajesh@nodle.com>
Signed-off-by: R.Rajeshkumar <rajesh@nodle.com>
Part of #173
HighLights
Validators
is moved to bounded vector.Oracles
is Configured viaMaxValidators
.ValidatorsUpdated(u32)
&ValidatorsMaxOverflow(u32, u32)
TODO
Ready for final Intake Review