New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Run all CI on 8 cores #712
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #712 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 78.20% 78.20%
=======================================
Files 43 43
Lines 7580 7580
=======================================
Hits 5928 5928
Misses 1652 1652 Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
@aliXsed I think we should change the executors to 8 cores for cost savings. Executors are prices linear and performance gains are always under 100% for doubling the cores. However at 8 core all builds are under 1 hour. |
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ jobs: | |||
toolchain: ${{ env.nightly }} | |||
|
|||
tests: | |||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest-16-cores | |||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest-8-cores |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the slowest, 16 cores will push this down from 58 to 40 minutes
.github/workflows/ci.yml
Outdated
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ jobs: | |||
output.txt | |||
|
|||
tarpaulin: | |||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest-16-cores | |||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest-8-cores |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could run fine on 4 cores too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let's do that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good for me now
No description provided.