You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently it is possible 2 targets open a stream (the streams have to be different for this to happen) with the same identifier which will create a conflict on the LB side since the IP rules/routes will collide.
3 solutions are possible:
Have common identifier range with a unique identifier for each target
The number of identifier in use in equal to the number of target in the trench
Stream and target needs to be detached in the LB. The conduit configures the target rules/routes.
Have common identifier range with a unique identifier for each stream opened
The number of identifier in use in equal to the number of stream opened in the trench
Separated identifier ranges
Each stream should have a max size + offset
Needs extra parameters in the configmap and some work on the Operator to find available offset
Vips replaced by flow in streams on the LB
2nd solution of #89 implemented
Target example:
- ctraffic updated to latest version
- 3 TCP instances (5000, 5001, 5002) and 2 UDP instances (5003, 5004)
Vips replaced by flow in streams on the LB
2nd solution of #89 implemented
Target example:
- ctraffic updated to latest version
- 3 TCP instances (5000, 5001, 5002) and 2 UDP instances (5003, 5004)
Currently it is possible 2 targets open a stream (the streams have to be different for this to happen) with the same identifier which will create a conflict on the LB side since the IP rules/routes will collide.
3 solutions are possible:
related issue: #32
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: