Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bandwidth setting for 2023.02 unclear with increased sample rate #920

Closed
jcmartin opened this issue May 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

Bandwidth setting for 2023.02 unclear with increased sample rate #920

jcmartin opened this issue May 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
Issue: Enhancement Missing functionality, or a new feature request

Comments

@jcmartin
Copy link

jcmartin commented May 6, 2023

Presently, the valid bandwidth range returned for bladeRF 2.0 on release 2023.02 from (bladerf_get_bandwidth_range): [200000,200001..56000000]. bladerf_get_sample_rate_range returns [520834,520835..122880000].

The newest release now supports a sample rate of 122.88MHz, and the demo on the nuand website shows a spectrogram of 80MHz. It is unclear what the user should set the bandwidth to in order to maximize the returned bandwidth.

  • If the user should set the bandwidth to 56000000, I suggest that this be documented.
  • If the user should set the bandwidth to 112000000, I suggest that bladerf_get_bandwidth_range reflect this value.
@rthomp10 rthomp10 added the Issue: Enhancement Missing functionality, or a new feature request label Jun 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Issue: Enhancement Missing functionality, or a new feature request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants