Implement objective-driven prompt crafting for text-to orgstructure generation

[tom-leamon]

I've come to realize the value of defining clear objectives that can assist in crafting the text-to-orgstructure prompt. Instead of directly typing the prompt, a guided process to define the objectives and sub-objectives will result in a more precise and effective prompt.

Benefits:

1. Streamlined User Intent: By providing a guided process to define objectives, users can better streamline and clarify their intentions.
2. Consistency: With a clear set of objectives, the resulting org structure will be more consistent with the user's vision.
3. Efficiency: Reduces the back-and-forth and potential misunderstandings, making the org structure generation more efficient.
4. Stakeholder Communication: Sharing the defined objectives before the actual structure generation provides transparency and clarity to any team or stakeholders.
5. Flexibility: Users can iteratively refine and adjust objectives before the org structure is generated.
6. Scalability: Well-defined objectives can be reused as templates for future similar projects.

Feature Requirements:

• A guided UI/UX flow to help users define objectives and sub-objectives.
• An intelligent recommendation system that can suggest objectives based on the user's input.
• A preview pane to show the resulting text-to-orgstructure prompt as objectives are added/modified.
• Options for users to save and reuse objectives for similar projects in the future.

Possible Challenges:

• Ensuring that the guided process is intuitive and user-friendly.
• The intelligent recommendation system should be robust and avoid suggesting irrelevant objectives.

[tom-leamon]

Following up on the initial feature request, it's crucial to understand that different projects have different scopes and requirements. The following suggestions could further improve the Harmony structure generation:

1. Team Size Consideration:
   While Harmony currently appears to be focused on multi-person chat environments like Slack or Discord, there's a significant need for structures catering to smaller teams or even individual projects. Incorporating an option to input the expected team size could help generate more tailored org structures.

2. Project Types:

   • Multi-person business chat:
     • Considerations: Primarily focused on communication, likely to have many groups representing different departments or teams. Channels within those groups might be topic-specific (e.g., announcements, general chat).
     • Use of Groups/Channels: Groups represent departments or teams. Channels break down communication by topics or specific projects.
   • Solo research project:
     • Considerations: Mainly focused on organization of research data and findings. Less need for multiple channels but might require structured groups for various research phases or topics.
     • Use of Groups/Channels: Groups could represent research phases (e.g., Literature Review, Data Collection). Limited use of channels.
   • Small collaborative tasks:
     • Considerations: Geared towards collaboration on a few tasks or projects. Might not require multiple groups but channels could be task-specific.
     • Use of Groups/Channels: Minimal use of groups, but channels could be created for each specific task.
   • Open-source community-driven projects:
     • Considerations: Requires open communication channels for community members, dedicated channels for contributors, and structured groups for different aspects of the project (e.g., development, design).
     • Use of Groups/Channels: Groups might represent different facets of the project. Channels could cater to general community discussions, specific project updates, and contributor-specific communication.
   • Academic projects:
     • Considerations: Might need a mix of open communication channels for all team members and specific groups/channels for different parts of the academic project (e.g., research, writing, presentation).
     • Use of Groups/Channels: Groups could be structured around project phases. Channels could break down tasks within those phases.

3. Flexible Chat Integration:
   While chat-oriented structures are valuable, not every project may be tied to an ongoing multi-person chat environment. There's a need for more versatile structures that cater to projects where chat might not be the primary mode of communication.

By introducing these features, Harmony can cater to a wider range of projects and become a more versatile tool for organizational structure generation.

---