Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add usage information on which MODs use which ontologies #607

Closed
cmungall opened this issue May 2, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Add usage information on which MODs use which ontologies #607

cmungall opened this issue May 2, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
documentation Issues related to documentation presented on the website or relevant to Foundry-provided tools ontology metadata Issues related to ontology metadata

Comments

@cmungall
Copy link
Contributor

cmungall commented May 2, 2018

MODs use a variety of ontologies in their annotations. We should capture this in the usage field

E.g.
ftp://ftp.flybase.net/releases/current/precomputed_files/ontologies/
ftp://ftp.rgd.mcw.edu/pub/data_release/

@jonquet
Copy link

jonquet commented Jun 6, 2018

Are you looking for a property to represent the information: "the project/database/organization X uses ontology Y" ? If yes, then I can tell we have not found such property in the 23 metadata vocabularies reviewed when we refactor AgroPortal's ontology metadata model.

To my knowledge BioPortal is the only platform that capture such a relation with their ontology/project relation.
Within AgBioData initiative, we have reused this feature to capture the results of a survey done to all the DBs of this group and the result is now stored in AgroPortal. For instance all the ontologies used by the Planteome project are available here: http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/projects/Planteome
The other way arround, all the project which use TO are available at: http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/TO/projects

As you see, the metadata properties used are "http://data.bioontology.org/metadata/Ontology/ontolgyUsed" and "projects" which is not branded by NCBO as a metadata vocabulary.

More recently in our MOD proposition (https://github.com/sifrproject/MOD-Ontology)... work in progress, inside MOD1.2 (http://www.lirmm.fr/~jonquet/publications/documents/Article_MTSR-2017_MOD1.2.pdf)
We have created a property mod:ontologyInUse in the MOD name space because as said we have not found one to use in any of the 23 reviewed vocab.

@jonquet
Copy link

jonquet commented Jun 6, 2018

Well, to summarize, I suggest to use http://www.isibang.ac.in/ns/mod#ontologyInUse
(not that URI are not persistent yet)

@cmungall
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmungall commented Jun 7, 2018

That link is dead...

But it's not enough to use a single triple. We either need to reify the triple or create a usageInstance (we do the latter now). For OBO Foundry purposes it is not sufficient to say X uses Y. We want to know of the usage: what kind of usage, what is the reference, what is an example, is the verified by the OBO Foundry, etc. Have a look at the usage field in some of the yamls

@nlharris nlharris added the ontology metadata Issues related to ontology metadata label Mar 23, 2020
@nlharris nlharris added the documentation Issues related to documentation presented on the website or relevant to Foundry-provided tools label Jan 29, 2021
@nlharris
Copy link
Contributor

Is this done or still needed?

@nlharris
Copy link
Contributor

nlharris commented Oct 6, 2022

Closing; reopen if needed.

@matentzn matentzn closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Feb 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Issues related to documentation presented on the website or relevant to Foundry-provided tools ontology metadata Issues related to ontology metadata
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants