[12.0][MIG] - account_invoice_accrual migration to 12.0 #113
Conversation
…an be not initialized
… res_partner * Use default cutoff journal which is on company * Use accrual accounts defined on account_cutoff_accraul_base * Use accounts mapping which is implemented in account_cutoff_base * Adapt test suite
…k invoice if accrual entry is draft * Remove accrual in case of invoice's validation if accrual entry is draft and if entry genereted by the validation is on the same period as accrual * Otherwise, accrual entry is reversed
Currently translated at 100,0% (39 of 39 strings) Translation: account-closing-10.0/account-closing-10.0-account_invoice_accrual Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/account-closing-10-0/account-closing-10-0-account_invoice_accrual/de/
Updated by Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge) hook in Weblate.
|
Hey @sbejaoui, thank you for your Pull Request. It looks like some users haven't signed our Contributor License Agreement, yet.
Appreciation of efforts, |
sbejaoui
force-pushed
the
12.0-mig-account_invoice_accrual
branch
from
bbcf3dd
to
d10a757
Compare
sbejaoui
force-pushed
the
12.0-mig-account_invoice_accrual
branch
from
d10a757
to
960ee48
Compare
sbejaoui
force-pushed
the
12.0-mig-account_invoice_accrual
branch
2 times, most recently
from
80771c3
to
2359e94
Compare
| "views/account_invoice_view.xml", | ||
| "wizard/account_move_accrue_view.xml", | ||
| ], | ||
| "demo": [], |
| <field name="name">account.move.accrue.form</field> | ||
| <field name="model">account.move.accrue</field> | ||
| <field name="arch" type="xml"> | ||
| <form string="Create accrual journal entries" version="7.0"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| <form string="Create accrual journal entries" version="7.0"> | |
| <form string="Create accrual journal entries"> |
|
@sbejaoui would you have a moment to look at this PR ? It would be nice to have it merged before the big migration to 14 starts. cc/ @alexis-via |
This PR is blocked due to the dependency of A new module took place account_document_reversal. I couldn't read all the discussions about this move. But I believe it's better to get rid of this dependency if the standard reverse feature do the job. Otherwise we need to adapt |
|
There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days. |
github-actions
bot
added
the
stale
No description provided.