-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 605
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[mis_builder] extended account selectors #345
Labels
Comments
We use mostly gl account tags. And can only use donain selection now, which
makes it slow. Would be great that tags was in the selecion options, to
make searches faster.
…On Sep 3, 2017 3:09 PM, "Stéphane Bidoul (ACSONE)" ***@***.***> wrote:
Accounting expressions in mis_builder have the form
(bal|crd|deb)(p|i|e)[account selector]([optional move line domain])?
The account selector is currently based on account codes (eg 70%).
Further account filtering can be added in the move line domain (eg
('account_id.type, '=', ...)) but that is slow because additional
database queries must be done, whereas the account selector boils done to
oneread_group` per period and move line domain.
So it is desirable to avoid using the move line domains to filter on
accounts.
To implement this, the account selector can be extended to support any
domain on gl accounts.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#345>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHU_Vg-cQpcfFc-k4vDGxx76fbZm8jY6ks5seqT8gaJpZM4PLLjI>
.
|
Absolutely! So you will be able to write On a related topic, optimizing selection on taxes would be interesting too, so you could write an efficient tax report with mis_builder. |
This issue was moved to OCA/mis-builder#4 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Accounting expressions in mis_builder have the form
(bal|crd|deb)(p|i|e)[account selector]([optional move line domain])?
The account selector is currently based on account codes (eg
70%
).Further account filtering can be added in the move line domain, eg
('account_id.type', '=', ...)
. But that is slow because additional database queries must be done, whereas the account selector boils done to oneread_group
per period and move line domain.So it is desirable to avoid using the move line domains to filter on accounts.
To implement this, the account selector can be extended to support any domain on gl accounts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: