-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[MIG][12.0] account_fiscal_position_type (from 8.0) #94
[MIG][12.0] account_fiscal_position_type (from 8.0) #94
Conversation
d9df204
to
b657375
Compare
/ocabot merge |
On my way to merge this fine PR! |
@legalsylvain your merge command was aborted due to failed check(s), which you can inspect on this commit of 12.0-ocabot-merge-pr-94-by-legalsylvain-bump-no. After fixing the problem, you can re-issue a merge command. Please refrain from merging manually as it will most probably make the target branch red. |
b657375
to
0e88e68
Compare
0e88e68
to
236571a
Compare
…tion_type-fix [FIX] wrong attribute
This PR has the |
/ocabot merge patch |
What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it! |
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 8ec4220. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
Port account_fiscal_position_type from 8.0 to 12.0.
Module :
New module that adds type_position_use field on account.fiscal.position model. possible value ('sale' / 'purchase' / 'all' as for account.tax). If set, fiscal position will be available on out or in invoices, limiting incorrect values.
See : #93
CC : @pedrobaeza, @renatonlima, @rvalyi, @PierrickBrun, @quentinDupont
#GRAPOCA