[WIP][14.0][IMP] account_reconciliation_widget: Use in_payment

[pedrobaeza]

This was forced to "paid" on community, but we can make use of the feature.

See https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/c8c3c133385a36460f3da7ed00b59116c9bcf693/addons/account/models/account_move.py#L1346-L1348 for more info.

[ozono]

LGTM. Maybe a better way would be enable this state in a separated module / add a dependency. But, in the other way, if another module needs this state can override this method too...Itś OK. Thanks @pedrobaeza

[pedrobaeza]

I'm still seeing the consequences, and yes, I will probably put not a separate module, but an option like the one in journals. Now Odoo always consider in_payment state when registering payments, so that leads to "non finished" flows without reconciliation, so I don't like it too much, but as said, I'm yet gathering all the information.

[TeoGoddet]

To skip the in_payment state and have 2 moves (bank->payable->expense) instead of 3 (bank->outstanding->payable->expense), one need to set the outstanding accounts to the bank account.

When you use register payment with this setup, you a got fully paid invoice directly.
See this invoice http://oca-account-reconcile-14-0-pr459-66f35e640d49.runboat.odoo-community.org/web#id=11&action=207&model=account.move&view_type=form&cids=&menu_id=107 (check the cash account config)

Vs this one http://oca-account-reconcile-14-0-pr459-66f35e640d49.runboat.odoo-community.org/web#id=12&action=209&model=account.move&view_type=form&cids=&menu_id=107

I think that's the correct behavior

[TeoGoddet]

Code and Functional review OK ! Thanks !
Maybe you should add some docs for the journal configuration and reconciliation workflows

[pedrobaeza]

This is still WIP

[github-actions]

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

[marcelsavegnago]

@pedrobaeza Are you planning to continue with this PR?

What do you think about implementing it in a separate module? If that's the case, I can do it and submit a PR. What do you think? And if you have a name suggestion, I appreciate it.

[pedrobaeza]

Still in my TODO, but I think it can be in the same module. If you can take a look, please tell us.