[9.0] Use correct syntax to add options with onchange on stock picking #131
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Small fix for an issue I found : if the carrier is edited manually on a stock picking, the values given to the one2many field "option_ids" are a RecordSet.
It works fine when editing, but afterwards, when the picking is written, the values are with the format
{'option_ids': [(1, <ID of the option>, <value of the option>)]}
, not{'option_ids': [(6, False, [<ID of the option>])]}
, which leads to the values not being written in the picking.