Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migration to version 16.0 #880

Open
6 of 12 tasks
sbidoul opened this issue Oct 3, 2022 · 5 comments
Open
6 of 12 tasks

Migration to version 16.0 #880

sbidoul opened this issue Oct 3, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
help wanted no stale Use this label to prevent the automated stale action from closing this PR/Issue. work in progress
Milestone

Comments

@sbidoul
Copy link
Member

sbidoul commented Oct 3, 2022

Todo

https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-tools/wiki/Migration-to-version-16.0

Modules to migrate

Missing module? Check https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-tools/wiki/%5BFAQ%5D-Missing-modules-in-migration-issue-list

@sbidoul sbidoul added help wanted no stale Use this label to prevent the automated stale action from closing this PR/Issue. work in progress labels Oct 3, 2022
@sbidoul sbidoul added this to the 16.0 milestone Oct 3, 2022
@jado95
Copy link

jado95 commented Apr 17, 2023

Hi, it is possible update module contract_sale with #915?

@JesusValdez96
Copy link

Please add the missing module contract_invoice_start_end_dates to the list.
PR here: #950

@CRogos
Copy link
Contributor

CRogos commented May 22, 2023

Continuing contract_sale in #949

@maisim
Copy link

maisim commented Jun 19, 2024

Hi !
I tried to backport product_contract from 17 (#1090) rather than migrate from 15 (#959), thinking it would be more up to date. This is done quite easily. Does this suit you in principle or would you prefer that we continue on the migration from 15.0 (#959) ?

cc @Rad0van what do you think?

@Rad0van
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

Rad0van commented Jun 19, 2024

Hi !
I tried to backport product_contract from 17 (#1090) rather than migrate from 15 (#959), thinking it would be more up to date. This is done quite easily. Does this suit you in principle or would you prefer that we continue on the migration from 15.0 (#959) ?

cc @Rad0van what do you think?

AFAIK port to 17 is based (at least partially) on my port to 16. So I wouldn't expect any major differences. I just need to finish two or three contents on 16. Will do it today.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted no stale Use this label to prevent the automated stale action from closing this PR/Issue. work in progress
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants