porting alla v8 "as-is" di account_vat_period_end_statement

[eLBati]

TODO

• Descrizione e contributors come da https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-tools/tree/master/template/module
• The model remove.period.from.vat.statement has no access rules, consider adding one: il che significa che il branch https://github.com/andrea4ever/l10n-italy/tree/8.0-fix-issues75 contiene una versione vecchia del modulo. Infatti nella 7 https://github.com/OCA/l10n-italy/blob/7.0/account_vat_period_end_statement/wizard/remove_period.py#L29 questo problema è fixed

...

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-29.74%) to 38.42% when pulling 2d579c6 on andrea4ever:8.0-fix-issues75 into 5258f20 on OCA:8.0.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-27.72%) to 40.44% when pulling 3161e89 on andrea4ever:8.0-fix-issues75 into 5258f20 on OCA:8.0.

[tafaRU]

Travis build says:

No output has been received in the last 10 minutes, this potentially indicates a stalled build or something wrong with the build itself.

Someone of maintainers could please restart the travis build?

Thank you in advance.

[tafaRU]

@andrea4ever, could you please confirm whether the points in TO DO list are completed? I am referring in particular to the latter.

Thank you in advance.

[andrea4ever]

@tafaRU all points in TO DO are solved!

[tafaRU]

@andrea4ever thanks a lot!

[tafaRU]

@andrea4ever I see your branch is 48 commits behind OCA:8.0. Could you please rebase on it?

Thank you in advance.

[andrea4ever]

@tafaRU Rebase Ok for me, can you check?

[eLBati]

@andrea4ever did you include every more recent change from 7.0 version of account_vat_period_end_statement, or just the remove.period.from.vat.statement one? Could you indicate the commit(s) where this is done?
Thanks

[andrea4ever]

@eLBati in this commit 0ac6a90, andrea4ever@0ac6a90

[tafaRU]

@andrea4ever rebase LGTM, the travis error seems not related to it, thanks!

[tafaRU]

@andrea4ever testando il branch ci siamo accorti di un errore a questa riga: https://github.com/OCA/l10n-italy/pull/105/files#diff-99ee513335d65d4ac645e350b767267dR115 (manca uno spazio che manda in errore la query).

Visto che non è possibile vedere il diff con la versione precedente ho preferito partire da una soluzione pulita e creare #108

Chiuderei pertanto la corrente, grazie!

[andrea4ever]

@tafaRU ok!

[tafaRU]

Superseded by #108