Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[12.0] IMP l10n_it_reverse_charge supporting multi company #1468

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 21, 2019

Conversation

eLBati
Copy link
Member

@eLBati eLBati commented Sep 20, 2019

Descrizione del problema o della funzionalità:

Vedi #1467

--
Confermo di aver firmato il CLA https://odoo-community.org/page/cla e di aver letto le linee guida su https://odoo-community.org/page/contributing

@eLBati eLBati changed the title IMP l10n_it_reverse_charge supporting multi company [12.0] IMP l10n_it_reverse_charge supporting multi company Sep 20, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@robyf70 robyf70 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@mrcast mrcast left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Confermo che RC type ha comportamento multicompany

@eLBati
Copy link
Member Author

eLBati commented Sep 21, 2019

/ocabot merge minor

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it!
Prepared branch 12.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1468-by-eLBati-bump-minor, awaiting test results.

OCA-git-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2019
Signed-off-by eLBati
@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 46506e6 into OCA:12.0 Sep 21, 2019
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at baac7a4. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants