Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[12.0] [FIX][l10n_it_account] Fix: better management of account_balance_sign… #1585

Merged

Conversation

SilvioGregorini
Copy link
Contributor

…s upon account types and account groups

Collegato a #1583

--
Confermo di aver firmato il CLA https://odoo-community.org/page/cla e di aver letto le linee guida su https://odoo-community.org/page/contributing

@eLBati eLBati changed the title [FIX][l10n_it_account] Fix: better management of account_balance_sign… [12.0] [FIX][l10n_it_account] Fix: better management of account_balance_sign… Jan 9, 2020
Copy link
Member

@eLBati eLBati left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Grazie!

Riesci mica ad aggiungere un test per coprire anche quando effettivamente ci sono padri e segni
https://codecov.io/gh/OCA/l10n-italy/compare/65a57c9e6335773fb1309ddbcadd683aa9719ce1...68a425d113e6b6b14a45eb6a5876ba0e63987d0f/diff
?

@SilvioGregorini
Copy link
Contributor Author

@eLBati non mi è ben chiaro cosa dovrei fare, relativamente ai test...

@eLBati
Copy link
Member

eLBati commented Jan 10, 2020

@SilvioGregorini mancherebbe un test per get_account_balance_sign.
Comunque non avevo visto che have_same_sign è coperto, quindi decidi tu se aumentare la copertura a get_account_balance_sign o fare merge così com'è

Copy link
Member

@eLBati eLBati left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah però in questo momento non si può installare l10n_it_account su un DB con i conti già creati: SilvioGregorini#1

@SilvioGregorini
Copy link
Contributor Author

@eLBati grazie della PR, non mi ero accorto che ci fosse il blocco.
Devo risistemare la commit history squashando il commit di merge, o lascio così?

@eLBati
Copy link
Member

eLBati commented Jan 13, 2020

@SilvioGregorini potresti rimuovere il commit di merge con un rebase (non so se ocabot lo faccia)

SilvioGregorini and others added 2 commits January 13, 2020 12:11
…le installation when accounts are already created (otherwise installation is blocked)
@SilvioGregorini SilvioGregorini force-pushed the 12.0-FIX-l10n_it_account_balance_signs branch from 50220c2 to 75a1cc5 Compare January 13, 2020 11:12
@SilvioGregorini
Copy link
Contributor Author

@eLBati fatto 👍

Copy link
Member

@eLBati eLBati left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@eLBati
Copy link
Member

eLBati commented Jan 14, 2020

/ocabot merge minor

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it!
Prepared branch 12.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1585-by-eLBati-bump-minor, awaiting test results.

OCA-git-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2020
Signed-off-by eLBati
@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 75a1cc5 into OCA:12.0 Jan 14, 2020
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 231fc65. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot changed the title [12.0] [FIX][l10n_it_account] Fix: better management of account_balance_sign… [12.0] [FIX][l10n_it_account] Fix: better management of account_balance_sign… Jan 14, 2020
@SilvioGregorini SilvioGregorini deleted the 12.0-FIX-l10n_it_account_balance_signs branch January 14, 2020 09:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants