-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 661
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[MIG] 9.0 product_code_builder #204
Conversation
the help must be a string, not a tuple.
[ADD] Add Porduct Attribute Global Item Code [FIX] Problems in openerp file [ADD] README [ADD] README [FIX] modify openerp and product [FIX] Sql Constraints [FIX] Sql Constraints v2 [FIX] Product Attribute Global Item Code [FIX] problems with openerp and init files [FIX] problems with product file [DEL] delete Product Variant inactive [FIX] README image [FIX] readme Image [FIX] readme Image V2 [FIX] readme Image V2 [FIX] readme Image V2 [FIX] regenerate and update fr.po [FIX] i18n and add comments [ADD] Odoo Community Association (OCA) as author in the list and cut image [FIX] help [ADD] help in product file [ADD] help in product file [MOD] modify init file [FIX] delete Blank line [FIX] error code [MOD] modify Readme file [fix] product file [FIX] blank lines [MOD] product file [add] handle in view file [FIX] product_attribute_global_item_code [FIX] problem code and rename use_manual_internal_ref field [FIX] remane use_manual_ref to use_manual_internal_ref [FIX] merge global_code with code models [DEL] delete product_attribute_code [FIX] rename product builder code [IMP] improve product file [IMP] improve product code builder [ADD] auto_install and installable in openerp file [IMP] blank line at end of file [FIX] Readme and product files
…dated, and also the field name
…, wrong value in the depends
Fix tests Add documentation Translate and Pep8 in test_code.py Add incompatibilty with product_sequence module Change behavior of auto Auto = On -> generate default_code Auto = Off -> use only user provided default_code Previously prefix was used with auto == off
…ompatibility with other module
…ue for computing the default code
9f99bd1
to
6113e0c
Compare
'category': 'Product', | ||
'version': '9.0.1.0.0', | ||
'depends': [ | ||
'product', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
only one 1 dependency sufficient ? the last, I think
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any news @lmignon ? Do you want a PR, there ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bealdav Sorry for the late reply... Both are required since I extends the views defined in product and therefore I have a direct dependency on product. In case of direct dependency it's always better to avoid to rely on the fact that this dependency is transitively acquired by an other one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok
seems ok and doing the job |
|
||
class ProductAttributeValue(models.Model): | ||
_inherit = "product.attribute.value" | ||
_code = "code" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What does this line do? I'm trying to port to 10 but can find no usage of it anywhere in odoo
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a mistake 726c16e
it must be _order = 'code' . Sorry for that
@gdgellatly Note that product_attribute_priority (dependent module) is ported to v9 |
I think this is not needed anymore with the revamp product_variant_default_code in OCA/product-variant. Isn't it? |
I thought that revamp was v10?
…On Sat, 24 Feb 2018, 7:29 AM Pedro M. Baeza, ***@***.***> wrote:
I think this is not needed anymore with the revamp
product_variant_default_code in OCA/product-variant. Isn't it?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#204 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE23kNyT1SUbDeUiDBmo89ZdzV91GOhdks5tXwNugaJpZM4KwzBZ>
.
|
Uhm, right. OK, but I'm seeing this in a place that maybe is not the best, and it requires 3 modules to work. I think it's better to backport the other one. |
I've long said that these modules don't belong here so no argument from me.
And If someone wants to backport the other one again no argument. It is
more feature complete.
…On Sat, 24 Feb 2018, 7:35 AM Pedro M. Baeza, ***@***.***> wrote:
Uhm, right. OK, but I'm seeing this in a place that maybe is not the best,
and it requires 3 modules to work. I think it's better to backport the
other one.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#204 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE23kLaD12mxeLAaYouOJWjR73UK-FC5ks5tXwT5gaJpZM4KwzBZ>
.
|
Closing this as very old. Please feel free to reopen it if needed |
migration from 8.0
depends of #203