Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

customer context in product view port to v8 #76

Merged

Conversation

gdgellatly
Copy link
Contributor

Remove non working code
Change module name to better reflect new scope
Update button to smart button
Reorganize to new coding guidelines
Add README.RST
bump minor version number

Remove non working code
Change module name to better reflect new scope
Update button to smart button
Reorganize to new coding guidelines
Add README.RST
bump minor version number
@gdgellatly
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think you will find I have signed the CLA

@gurneyalex
Copy link
Member

CLA ok 😸

To install this module, you need to:

* do nothing special

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this paragraph should be removed

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@gurneyalex I wrote it as a joke initially, however the more I think about it I think it should stay in or we should have some standard wording of the same effect and add it to quality tools. Telling a user what they don't need to do is equally valuable as telling them what they do need to do, and if we put it everywhere and make consistent it will prompt module developers when it changes.

Maybe a simple line like, This Module has no specific installation requirements, and for the one below, This module requires no post installation configuration

@gurneyalex
Copy link
Member

runbot status related to #77

2 non blocking remarks.

👍

@rousseldenis
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

👍 tested on runbot

@gdgellatly
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pedrobaeza can we make a call on whether we merge this or not. I'm long since over v8 so happy to close as well and I've done the v10 port work in #246 .

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

OK, let's merge it to have it for those using v8.

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza merged commit ec3ee11 into OCA:8.0 Apr 18, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants