Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[10.0] [ADD] purchase_landed_cost from odoomrp #409

Merged
merged 35 commits into from
Oct 2, 2018

Conversation

Roodin
Copy link
Contributor

@Roodin Roodin commented Jun 8, 2017

No description provided.

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

pedrobaeza commented Jun 9, 2017

Please check Travis

@Tecnativa

@Roodin Roodin force-pushed the 10.0-purchase_landed_costs_ODOOMRP branch from 42f54d4 to b85d85d Compare June 14, 2017 11:32
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza changed the title 10.0 add purchase landed cost from odoomrp [10.0] [ADD] purchase_landed_cost from odoomrp Aug 31, 2017
pedrobaeza and others added 27 commits December 4, 2017 13:14
… real cost method is selected, and quant cost price adjustment
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza force-pushed the 10.0-purchase_landed_costs_ODOOMRP branch from b85d85d to df3afec Compare December 4, 2017 12:14
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza force-pushed the 10.0-purchase_landed_costs_ODOOMRP branch from df3afec to dd8c861 Compare December 4, 2017 16:54
bealdav pushed a commit to akretion/purchase-workflow that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2018
@rafaelbn
Copy link
Member

@pedrobaeza travis and runbot is green, what do you think?

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza added this to the 10.0 milestone Oct 2, 2018
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza merged commit 3bba12c into OCA:10.0 Oct 2, 2018
@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

cc @cubells

@cubells
Copy link
Sponsor Member

cubells commented Oct 2, 2018

@pedrobaeza thanks

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza mentioned this pull request Nov 15, 2018
38 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants