Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIX] - Always run the scheduled action with the scheduler user #160

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 1, 2019

Conversation

sbejaoui
Copy link
Contributor

This PR fix this issue:

When a user tries to manually run a scheduled action set to run as a queue job.
the job is created using the scheduler user, but run with the user who triggered the action.

@sbejaoui sbejaoui force-pushed the 12.0-fix_manual_trigger_user-sbj branch from a3ec22d to b4077dc Compare July 18, 2019 15:50
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@guewen
Copy link
Member

guewen commented Oct 1, 2019

/ocabot merge minor

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 12.0-ocabot-merge-pr-160-by-guewen-bump-minor, awaiting test results.

OCA-git-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2019
Signed-off-by guewen
@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit b4077dc into OCA:12.0 Oct 1, 2019
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 71988a1. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants