Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[15.0][MIG] sale_coupon_criteria_order_based: Migration to version 15.0 #114

Merged

Conversation

pilarvargas-tecnativa
Copy link
Contributor

cc @Tecnativa TT38306

@chienandalu @ernestotejeda please review :)

@pilarvargas-tecnativa pilarvargas-tecnativa force-pushed the 15.0-mig-sale_coupon_criteria_order_based branch 2 times, most recently from e0d2ab5 to 0374f09 Compare February 20, 2023 12:00
@pilarvargas-tecnativa pilarvargas-tecnativa force-pushed the 15.0-mig-sale_coupon_criteria_order_based branch from 0374f09 to 5ec163b Compare February 20, 2023 12:40
Copy link
Member

@chienandalu chienandalu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! 👍

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

/ocabot migration sale_coupon_criteria_order_based

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added this to the 15.0 milestone Feb 21, 2023
@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot mentioned this pull request Feb 21, 2023
21 tasks
@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 15.0-ocabot-merge-pr-114-by-pedrobaeza-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 6014990 into OCA:15.0 Feb 21, 2023
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 10ea3ba. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

pilarvargas-tecnativa pushed a commit to Tecnativa/sale-promotion that referenced this pull request May 30, 2023
Signed-off-by pedrobaeza
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants