Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MIG][9.0] sale automatic workflow #291

Merged
merged 121 commits into from
Jun 23, 2016
Merged

[MIG][9.0] sale automatic workflow #291

merged 121 commits into from
Jun 23, 2016

Conversation

SodexisTeam
Copy link
Member

sebastienbeau and others added 30 commits April 22, 2012 14:49
… task, indeed if we did it in the workflow we can not anymore unreconcile an invoice because it will be re-reconcile directly
…eed this feature was still not reimplemented
… to False params raise_error as it's a boolean
…der_policy, remove the 'postpaid' removed in openerp
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 12, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+4.4%) to 80.074% when pulling c44d8ab on sodexis:9.0-sale_automatic_workflow into d368776 on OCA:9.0.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 12, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+4.4%) to 80.074% when pulling 061300d on sodexis:9.0-sale_automatic_workflow into d368776 on OCA:9.0.

@SodexisTeam SodexisTeam changed the title [WIP][9.0] sale automatic workflow [MIG][9.0] sale automatic workflow May 12, 2016
@atchuthan
Copy link
Member

@guewen we can change the label to "Needs review"

@guewen
Copy link
Member

guewen commented May 12, 2016

@guewen we can change the label to "Needs review"

yeah!

<field name="workflow_process_id"/>
</group>
</page>
</xpath>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tabs spotted

@guewen
Copy link
Member

guewen commented May 12, 2016

There is a small issue with the Configuration menu (same issue in sale_exception btw):

selection_032

@guewen
Copy link
Member

guewen commented May 12, 2016

I really like the feature to customize the filters, well done!

Thanks :)

2 small things to fix, but 👍

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 12, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+4.4%) to 80.074% when pulling a41b0db on sodexis:9.0-sale_automatic_workflow into d368776 on OCA:9.0.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 30, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+4.4%) to 80.074% when pulling e08a7ac on sodexis:9.0-sale_automatic_workflow into d368776 on OCA:9.0.

The addon does not install if the table sale_workflow_process contains
records without filters, Odoo tries to get the xmlids of the default
values before the filters are created.
@guewen
Copy link
Member

guewen commented Jun 13, 2016

@atchuthan here's a fix for a corner case during the installation (existing records in sale.workflow.process, default are called before the filters are created): sodexis#1

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 14, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+4.4%) to 80.072% when pulling ca9257c on sodexis:9.0-sale_automatic_workflow into d368776 on OCA:9.0.

@atchuthan
Copy link
Member

@guewen thanks for the fix.

@gurneyalex
Copy link
Member

👍

@rafaelbn rafaelbn added this to the 9.0 milestone Jun 22, 2016
* Validate the invoice
* Confirm the picking

This module is used by Magentoerpconnect and Prestashoperpconnect.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pedrobaeza @sergio-teruel take a look for Prestashoperpconnect

@rafaelbn
Copy link
Member

Nice work thanks. 👍

@gurneyalex gurneyalex merged commit 1c12fd3 into OCA:9.0 Jun 23, 2016
@atchuthan atchuthan deleted the 9.0-sale_automatic_workflow branch June 23, 2016 11:30
@rousseldenis
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

@atchuthan I try to review the v10 migration, but I need some explanation about the filter (the char field).

Why having removed the char_domain widget ? So, as the char field is not used in code (filter_id is used), why isn't it in readonly?

@atchuthan
Copy link
Member

@rousseldenis sorry for the delay

first, we had a thought of using the char field directly but later due to time constraint, we worked directly with the filter.
Our idea was to use this char field where the users could setup their custom filter domain instead of making modifications to the filter domain directly.

Let us know if you need any support from our side. Thanks and let us know if you have started PR for v10 migration.

@rousseldenis
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

@atchuthan The migration to v10 has been started by @lasley

I want to port this discussion to #391

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet