Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[9.0] [ADD] Base User Role History #1683

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

baimont
Copy link

@baimont baimont commented Sep 30, 2019

No description provided.

@baimont baimont force-pushed the 9.0-add-base_user_role_history-bai branch from 2fd7943 to fe9cafd Compare September 30, 2019 14:19
Copy link

@ThomasBinsfeld ThomasBinsfeld left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@baimont Please add a roadmap for role deletion. If a role is deleted, the history line too. That may be improved later (maybe with a char field).

@baimont baimont force-pushed the 9.0-add-base_user_role_history-bai branch from fe9cafd to 669e123 Compare October 1, 2019 07:24
@baimont
Copy link
Author

baimont commented Oct 1, 2019

@baimont Please add a roadmap for role deletion. If a role is deleted, the history line too. That may be improved later (maybe with a char field).

@ThomasBinsfeld thanks, done

Copy link
Contributor

@sebalix sebalix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice module! Small comments

<field name="new_is_enabled"/>
</group>
</sheet>
<div class="oe_chatter"></div>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can be removed maybe? (we're not inheriting from mail.thread)

<field name="arch" type="xml">
<form create="0" edit="0" delete="0">
<header>
</header>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

<header> section empty, can be removed

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should keep it if one day someone wants to put something in header, he'll just have to add a header position="inside".

'website': 'https://github.com/OCA/server-tools',
'depends': [
# Odoo
'base',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need to depend on base

<field name="perm_create" eval="0"/>
<field name="perm_write" eval="0"/>
<field name="perm_unlink" eval="0"/>
</record>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally we create the ir.model.access through CSV, but not blocking.

'views/base_user_role_line_history.xml',
'views/res_users.xml',
],
'demo': [
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Empty keys can be removed.

@baimont
Copy link
Author

baimont commented Oct 1, 2019

Nice module! Small comments

Hello @sebalix and thanks for your comments.
Modifications have been made

Copy link
Contributor

@sebalix sebalix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LG

@sebalix
Copy link
Contributor

sebalix commented Oct 4, 2019

@baimont can you add

addons:
  postgresql: "9.6"

in the .travis.yml file to fix some of the issues?

@baimont baimont force-pushed the 9.0-add-base_user_role_history-bai branch from 7385fa5 to 155e48a Compare October 4, 2019 10:29
@baimont
Copy link
Author

baimont commented Oct 25, 2019

Travis is red but I don't think it's related to my changes.
What do you think @sebalix ?

@baimont baimont closed this Oct 25, 2019
@baimont baimont reopened this Oct 25, 2019
@sebalix
Copy link
Contributor

sebalix commented Oct 25, 2019

Doesn't seem related to your PR, there are some "SQL injection" issues in other modules detected by pylint-odoo.

@baimont
Copy link
Author

baimont commented Oct 28, 2019

Doesn't seem related to your PR, there are some "SQL injection" issues in other modules detected by pylint-odoo.

So merge is blocked because of other modules?
What can I do?

@sebalix
Copy link
Contributor

sebalix commented Oct 29, 2019

@baimont if you want to speed up the process don't hesitate to fix all other lints in a separated commit. Unless someone is ok to merge it as is (ping @pedrobaeza )

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

Sorry, we can't merge with a red status

@ThomasBinsfeld
Copy link

Long live the PR 🤷‍♂️

@baimont baimont force-pushed the 9.0-add-base_user_role_history-bai branch 3 times, most recently from 0b7e7b6 to 56d11de Compare December 17, 2019 14:18
@baimont
Copy link
Author

baimont commented Dec 17, 2019

Sorry, we can't merge with a red status

#1544 (comment)

The 9.0 branch is red since at least July 2018.
Travis is red because of code that has nothing to do with my changes.

@dreispt
Copy link
Sponsor Member

dreispt commented Apr 30, 2021

Travis is red, please resolve

@baimont baimont force-pushed the 9.0-add-base_user_role_history-bai branch from 56d11de to 03b38ee Compare May 3, 2021 11:32
@dreispt
Copy link
Sponsor Member

dreispt commented Jul 3, 2021

Travis is red.

@baimont
Copy link
Author

baimont commented Nov 7, 2023

Travis is red.

Not anymore :-D

@thomaspaulb
Copy link
Contributor

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 9.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1683-by-thomaspaulb-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

OCA-git-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2024
Signed-off-by thomaspaulb
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@thomaspaulb your merge command was aborted due to failed check(s), which you can inspect on this commit of 9.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1683-by-thomaspaulb-bump-nobump.

After fixing the problem, you can re-issue a merge command. Please refrain from merging manually as it will most probably make the target branch red.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 2, 2024

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Jun 2, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Jul 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved needs fixing stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants