Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

12.0 mig base_search_mail_content #351

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Mar 8, 2019

Conversation

ernestotejeda
Copy link
Member

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza added this to the 12.0 milestone Jan 10, 2019
@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot mentioned this pull request Jan 10, 2019
24 tasks
Copy link
Member

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add a temporary commit with oca_dependencies.txt file including:

server-tools https://github.com/Tecnativa/server-tools server-tools 12.0-mig-base_search_fuzzy

With this, the PR will be testeable and no Travis error. We can remove it later when the PR is merged.

About this PR, please squash some README update commits the same as in the other PR.

@ernestotejeda ernestotejeda force-pushed the 12.0-mig-base_search_mail_content branch 2 times, most recently from 758907a to c8007bf Compare January 10, 2019 21:14
@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

You can remove the oca_dependencies.txt part

Copy link
Sponsor Member

@cubells cubells left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you remove oca_dependencies line...

👍

LGTM

Code review and test

@ernestotejeda ernestotejeda force-pushed the 12.0-mig-base_search_mail_content branch 2 times, most recently from 3a556f6 to b76baca Compare January 14, 2019 17:20
@rafaelbn
Copy link
Member

rafaelbn commented Mar 7, 2019

@ernestotejeda please resolve conflicts

This branch has conflicts that must be resolved

@pedrobaeza your comments have been attended could you unblock please?

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

Please include #359

Copy link
Member

@yajo yajo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK when done last comment of @pedrobaeza.

@rafaelbn rafaelbn requested review from pedrobaeza and yajo March 7, 2019 15:44
@ernestotejeda ernestotejeda force-pushed the 12.0-mig-base_search_mail_content branch from b76baca to beb42bf Compare March 7, 2019 15:52
@ernestotejeda
Copy link
Member Author

ernestotejeda commented Mar 7, 2019

@pedrobaeza Now I have realized that this is one of the cases in which a module changes its name in the middle of its history. So I'm going to bring all the history and amend.

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@ernestotejeda ernestotejeda force-pushed the 12.0-mig-base_search_mail_content branch from 089cf29 to 8dfb420 Compare March 7, 2019 23:07
@ernestotejeda ernestotejeda force-pushed the 12.0-mig-base_search_mail_content branch from 8dfb420 to 435d686 Compare March 7, 2019 23:15
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza merged commit 3d485a4 into OCA:12.0 Mar 8, 2019
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza deleted the 12.0-mig-base_search_mail_content branch March 8, 2019 00:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet