Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIX] stock_barcodes: out picking location workflow #243

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 30, 2020

Conversation

chienandalu
Copy link
Member

When we've got an out picking, we're the logic workflow is that the scanned locations
is the location we're getting the stock from

cc @Tecnativa TT21753

@chienandalu
Copy link
Member Author

@sergio-teruel Please, can you take a look?

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza added this to the 11.0 milestone Jan 29, 2020
Copy link
Member

@rafaelbn rafaelbn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

When we've got an out picking, the logical workflow is that the scanned location
is the location we're getting the stock from
@chienandalu chienandalu force-pushed the 11.0-fix-stock_barcodes-location branch from efd636c to 0cdc4b0 Compare January 30, 2020 12:40
@chienandalu
Copy link
Member Author

@pedrobaeza Changes done

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

/ocabot merge patch

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 11.0-ocabot-merge-pr-243-by-pedrobaeza-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

OCA-git-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2020
Signed-off-by pedrobaeza
@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

To v12!

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 0cdc4b0 into OCA:11.0 Jan 30, 2020
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 461961f. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@chienandalu
Copy link
Member Author

FW Port #245

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants