Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MIG] [16.0] stock_picking_report_external_note #322

Merged

Conversation

Shide
Copy link
Contributor

@Shide Shide commented May 29, 2024

Straight forward migration, nothing changed

MT-6202 @moduon @EmilioPascual @Gelojr @rafaelbn @fcvalgar please review if you want :)

Copy link

@fcvalgar fcvalgar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you @Shide

Copy link
Contributor

@EmilioPascual EmilioPascual left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Functional and code review.

@rafaelbn rafaelbn added this to the 16.0 milestone May 31, 2024
@rafaelbn
Copy link
Member

/ocabot migration stock_picking_report_external_note

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot mentioned this pull request May 31, 2024
11 tasks
Copy link
Member

@rafaelbn rafaelbn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ocabot merge patch

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it!
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-322-by-rafaelbn-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 3c3d2e5 into OCA:16.0 May 31, 2024
5 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at f2c6cf2. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@Shide Shide deleted the 16.0-mig-stock_picking_report_external_note branch July 1, 2024 07:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants