New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
12.0 mig stock available #540
12.0 mig stock available #540
Conversation
Generic module to compute the stock quantity available to promise using several implementations. stock_available_immediatly is changed to become the first optional implementation. Cherry pick of commit 0b060f6 from the v7 branch [IMP] stock_available* uses new API [ADD] stock_available_mrp Module to take immediate manufaturing capability into account in the stock quantity available to promise. Conflicts: stock_available/res_config.py [DEL] move stock_available_mrp to __unported__ [ADD] stock_available_sale Take sale quotations into account in the stock quantity available to promise Cherry-picked from 497068f Conflicts: stock_available/res_config.py [DEL] move stock_available_sale to __unported__ [IMP] READMEs and TODOs Cherry-picked from v7 at 8add4be Conflicts: __unported__/stock_available_mrp/__openerp__.py stock_available/__openerp__.py stock_available_immediately/__openerp__.py [IMP] respect product decimal precision odoo/odoo#5512 and odoo-dev/odoo@b3e5a94 makes it clear the standard intends to support decimal precision on the product form.
…uct and product.template, now takes in account variants and correctly displays value. [FLAKE8] Removing duplicate modules and moving README.rst into __unported__ [ADD} location calculations [FIX] typo
not using internal qty_available that seems not to take in consideration reserved quants. [ADD] Tests
Commit 6c16913 changed the way we compute the immediately_usable_qty: instead of using the virtual stock, we used the sum of quants without reservations. But a quant may actually be reserved and still be available (for example it may be reserved for an internal move). Fixes OCA#79 Remove loop and use correct decorator Restore the features of stock_available_immediately The previous fix restored stock_available but then there was no way to exclude the incomming moves from the count. This belongs in stock_available_immediately, restoring it cleanly. This commit also takes care to respect the distinction between templates and variants, so it should fix OCA#73 too. Restore the qty avail. to promise on variant treeview PEP8
* fix the dependencies for the computed field * use api.multi instead of api.one to avoid calling super()._immediately_usable_qty in a loop (this improves perfs on a tree view display)
There are cases where we dot NOT want to simply sum the quantities of all the variants. For example when dealing with manufacturing capacities, we may have to chose between variants because we can't make ALL of them with the same components. So instead of a simple non-modular implementation, we'll let each module define his own implementation of how to compute the product template's quantity available for sale. Conflicts: stock_available/__openerp__.py stock_available_immediately/__openerp__.py
…ch field use to compute potential
[CHG] improve code regarding code review [ADD] add test [CHG] optimize stock computation by avoiding to call useless compute
… related unit test Increase version number of the module
Currently translated at 61.9% (13 of 21 strings) Translation: stock-logistics-warehouse-11.0/stock-logistics-warehouse-11.0-stock_available Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/stock-logistics-warehouse-11-0/stock-logistics-warehouse-11-0-stock_available/ar/
Hey @devang-dreambits, thank you for your Pull Request. It looks like some users haven't signed our Contributor License Agreement, yet.
Appreciation of efforts, |
420b5f7
to
e4ff621
Compare
Hey @devang-dreambits, thank you for your Pull Request. It looks like some users haven't signed our Contributor License Agreement, yet. Appreciation of efforts, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code review. Minor comments
stock_available/README.rst
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ | |||
.. image:: https://img.shields.io/badge/licence-AGPL--3-blue.svg |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you please follow migration guide about readme fragments : https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-tools/wiki/Migration-to-version-12.0 ?
# Copyright 2016 Sodexis | ||
# License AGPL-3.0 or later (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl.html). | ||
|
||
{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you please add some missing entries like in https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-tools/blob/master/template/module/__manifest__.py#L9
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Improve Code
stock_available/__manifest__.py
Outdated
|
||
{ | ||
'name': 'Stock available to promise', | ||
'version': '12.0.1.0.0', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@devang-dreambits Add website key and URL like https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-warehouse
stock_available/__init__.py
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | |||
# Copyright 2014 Numérigraphe |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
remove Copyright from all init
file
stock_available/README.rst
Outdated
|
||
.. image:: https://odoo-community.org/website/image/ir.attachment/5784_f2813bd/datas | ||
:alt: Try me on Runbot | ||
:target: https://runbot.odoo-community.org/runbot/153/11.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
11.0/12.0
I will have the opportunity to test this in the next few days. Woo hoo!! |
When testing this, I noticed that I was unable to set the "Exclude incoming goods" boolean via Inventory --> Settings. I looked into the module code, and it seems that the configuration option "Exclude incoming goods" is designed to install "stock_available_immediately" when set to TRUE as the help for this boolean is "This installs the module stock_available_immediately.". I don't see that module in this PR, and I don't see it available for testing at v12. The User Experience when stock_available_immediately isn't available is to appear to do nothing, as the boolean is not set to True, but the user is provided no warning. It appears that this module also optionally installs: stock_available_sale, sale_delivery_date, stock_available_mrp but I also don't see these modules available for testing at v12. So I can't really test until these other modules are available. Do I misunderstand something? I am going to take a look at stock_available_unreserved in an effort to understand the differences between this module and that one. |
…init__.py; added development_status & website in manifest.py
Hey @devang-dreambits, thank you for your Pull Request. It looks like some users haven't signed our Contributor License Agreement, yet. Appreciation of efforts, |
@devang-dreambits Could you add recent improvements from v10.0 like 29b6bcd#diff-2c6955de963025ce90888f7e13128f22 ? |
Yes indeed, stock_available module was designed like that and options to install other modules that depend on this are present anyway even if modules are not present. The good solution should be removing all those options here and adding them in each module. It's clearer for user. @lreficent @jbeficent @Cedric-Pigeon @devang-dreambits What do you think of this? That could be a good improvement for user experience |
Please just notice about performance issues with this module: |
@karan-dreambits are you interested in continuing this PR? There's another PR for the module in #632 that has an interesting change in the smart-button style, but yours have priority as first in arrive. |
@pedrobaeza I see #632 is much better so lets close this and let it supersede this :) |
@karan-dreambits Please, can you review #632 ?? |
Thanks for your comprehension, so closing. |
No description provided.