New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[12.0][MIG] procurement_auto_create_group #638
[12.0][MIG] procurement_auto_create_group #638
Conversation
7503ea0
to
a0e10a6
Compare
[UPD] Update procurement_auto_create_group.pot
Update translation files Updated by Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge) hook in Weblate.
ensure that the procurement group is only created in the procurment process. Sometimes the method _get_rule is just needed to obtain the information of the rule, and it isn't followed by the run of the procurement.
a0e10a6
to
14ad576
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Functional tests ok
Please check travis @mreficent |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code review 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code review. LGTM. You need to adapt all texts to remove procurement references.
14ad576
to
1119d01
Compare
@rousseldenis hope you like the new descriptions :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested on runbot, everything ok 👍
@rousseldenis good to go? |
@lreficent What I wanted to say is that 'procurement' does not exists anymore and so, 'running procurements' has no sense (from a functionnal point of view)... |
@rousseldenis I think it does, you still "procure" material, which is quite similar. Also technically it uses the method run, so is not that bad to say run the procurement (aka run "the need for materials"). Yet it could likely be stated more clearly, so... which is your proposal? |
Ok, that's good for me. I just didn't want user expect to find 'procurements'... Let's merge |
This PR has the |
/ocabot merge |
This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it! |
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 7935e7c. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ PS: Don't worry if GitHub says there are unmerged commits: it is due to a rebase before merge. All commits of this PR have been merged into |
Standard migration.