New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[12.0][MIG] stock_account_inventory_force_date #676
[12.0][MIG] stock_account_inventory_force_date #676
Conversation
* remove readonly in accounting_date * fix computation of the theoretical quantity
2742b29
to
66501f3
Compare
66501f3
to
280315e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code review
@daramousk can you update your review? Thanks! |
ping @daramousk |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great, although the code coverage needs to be raised so that stuff gets green.
@hveficent Do you plan to increase coverage ? |
@rousseldenis @daramousk, I think current tests cover most of the use cases. Not full coverage is due to doing an Inventory Adjustment of all product, so I can make it happen, but asserts can't be precise across changes in demo data, so I think it is not needed and it is ready to be merged. |
/ocabot merge |
What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it! |
It looks like something changed on |
It looks like something changed on |
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 8eee830. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
Standard migration
CC @eficent