Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[11.0][ADD] stock_picking_purchase_order_link #552

Merged

Conversation

AdriaGForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

This module extends standard WMS to add a smart button in pickings to go to
purchase order that creates the picking.

cc ~ @eficent

@AdriaGForgeFlow AdriaGForgeFlow force-pushed the 11.0-add-stock_picking_purchase_order_link branch from 03c1f9a to dd980c5 Compare July 16, 2019 08:47
Copy link
Sponsor Member

@JordiBForgeFlow JordiBForgeFlow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Works like a charm!

Copy link
Member

@nikul-serpentcs nikul-serpentcs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perfecto 👍

@LoisRForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

/ocabot merge

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it!
Rebased to 11.0-ocabot-merge-pr-552-by-lreficent-bump-no, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit dd980c5 into OCA:11.0 Jul 17, 2019
OCA-git-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2019
Signed-off-by lreficent
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 824a353. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

PS: Don't worry if GitHub says there are unmerged commits: it is due to a rebase before merge. All commits of this PR have been merged into 11.0.

@LoisRForgeFlow LoisRForgeFlow deleted the 11.0-add-stock_picking_purchase_order_link branch July 17, 2019 15:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants