Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

temporary PR for framework_agreement_sourcing + logistic_requisition #13

Closed

Conversation

lepistone
Copy link
Member

This is a temporary PR to test this two unmerged modules together.

Please do not merge this one.

Thanks!

lepistone and others added 30 commits October 22, 2014 17:53
… procurement anymore and drop shipping automatically validates it's procurement
…ping and need procurement groups are doing the job of spliting sale order into multiple procurement
set cost estimate lines to manually sourced and ensure user has set a po line
gurneyalex and others added 9 commits October 30, 2014 13:20
* use the correct API version in the wizard:
  the code would use self.pool.get which returns an old-API model
  and then use it through the new API

* add a yaml test for this sourcing flow (long because we need to manually
  process the whole PR)

* fix various isssues with new API use:
  - cannot write on a recorset with > 1 records
  - confusions with bits expecting records / ids
It does not seem to make much difference from the original one in
logistic_requisition.
The agreement field should already have a domain: no need to check with
an onchange that a consistent choice is made.
the code would use self.pool.get which returns an old-API model
and then use it through the new API
@lepistone lepistone force-pushed the agreement_sourcing+logistic_requisition branch from 523a6bb to 44dd69c Compare October 30, 2014 13:55
@lepistone
Copy link
Member Author

Now #8 has been merged, no more need for that one.

@lepistone lepistone closed this Oct 31, 2014
@lepistone lepistone deleted the agreement_sourcing+logistic_requisition branch October 31, 2014 08:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants