Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: don't set code on PO generated from agreement #29

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 10, 2014

Conversation

lepistone
Copy link
Member

When generating a purchase order from a framework agreement, the code
should be auto-generated from the sequence, and not be equal to the code
of the logistic requisition.

This bug was already fixed on v7 by Nicolas Bessi. Then for some reason,
while porting to v8 I re-enabled a commented out line bringing that
back.

Now it is deleted for good.

When generating a purchase order from a framework agreement, the code
should be auto-generated from the sequence, and not be equal to the code
of the logistic requisition.

This bug was already fixed on v7 by Nicolas Bessi. Then for some reason,
while porting to v8 I re-enabled a commented out line bringing that
back.

Now it is deleted for good.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.02%) when pulling 4212795 on lepistone:fix-from-agreement-to-po-number into 78fce04 on OCA:8.0.

@guewen
Copy link
Member

guewen commented Nov 8, 2014

👍

@gurneyalex
Copy link
Member

improvement suggestion: lepistone#1

apart from this 👍

@lepistone
Copy link
Member Author

Pulled @gurneyalex's test. Thanks

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+1.09%) when pulling e14a296 on lepistone:fix-from-agreement-to-po-number into 78fce04 on OCA:8.0.

@yvaucher
Copy link
Member

👍

yvaucher added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2014
fix: don't set code on PO generated from agreement
@yvaucher yvaucher merged commit 19dfec7 into OCA:8.0 Nov 10, 2014
@lepistone lepistone deleted the fix-from-agreement-to-po-number branch November 10, 2014 15:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants