Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

logistic order: more readonly states #79

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Dec 11, 2014

Conversation

lepistone
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@lepistone
Copy link
Member Author

actually I am adding a few more similar fixes in this branch. for that reason the WIP label.

@lepistone
Copy link
Member Author

...done

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.05%) when pulling dbd73d5 on lepistone:more-readonly-states into 721b681 on OCA:8.0.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.05%) when pulling dbd73d5 on lepistone:more-readonly-states into 721b681 on OCA:8.0.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+1.4%) when pulling a2fd384 on lepistone:more-readonly-states into 48a7b12 on OCA:8.0.

@lepistone
Copy link
Member Author

this needs review now. Thanks!

@@ -30,10 +33,6 @@
class logistic_requisition(orm.Model):
_inherit = "logistic.requisition"

REQ_STATES = {'confirmed': [('readonly', True)],
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are we sur no other addons use this one. Shouldn't we create a local valiable that alias the one in logistic requisition?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not aware of any @nbessi. If there are any we will find out soon enough (that should break on installation) and fix immediately.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lepistone never forget that there might be unpublished code or code outside OCA used out there 👅 .
But well I won't consider as blocking

because logistic_order depends on logistic_consignee
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.06%) when pulling 555cf39 on lepistone:more-readonly-states into e5c419d on OCA:8.0.

@gurneyalex
Copy link
Member

👍

2 similar comments
@nbessi
Copy link

nbessi commented Dec 10, 2014

👍

@bwrsandman
Copy link

👍

yvaucher added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2014
logistic order: more readonly states
@yvaucher yvaucher merged commit b899f12 into OCA:8.0 Dec 11, 2014
@lepistone lepistone deleted the more-readonly-states branch January 7, 2015 08:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants