Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: update CXL Host exerciser latency calculations #3088

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2024
Merged

fix: update CXL Host exerciser latency calculations #3088

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2024

Conversation

anandaravuri
Copy link
Contributor

-CXL Host exerciser latency calculations equation by consider the penalty start i.e.
B asically consider total clock cycles – penalty clock cycles for calculation instead of total cycles that comes in DSM.

Latency nano seconds  =  (number of ticks – penalty start ticks ) * 2.5

@anandaravuri
fix: update CXL Host exerciser latency calculations
d993722 
   -CXL Host exerciser latency calculations  equation by consider the penalty start i.e.
    B asically consider total clock cycles – penalty clock cycles for calculation instead of total cycles that comes in DSM.

    Latency nano seconds  =  (number of ticks – penalty start ticks ) * 2.5

Signed-off-by: anandaravuri <ananda.ravuri@intel.com>
@anandaravuri anandaravuri requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2024 21:36
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 7632146528

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 64.523%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 7630381188: -0.02%
Covered Lines: 15799
Relevant Lines: 24486
💛 - Coveralls

@anandaravuri anandaravuri merged commit 409755b into master Jan 23, 2024
27 checks passed
@anandaravuri anandaravuri deleted the aravuri/fix_latency branch January 23, 2024 21:58
anandaravuri added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2024
@anandaravuri
fix: update CXL Host exerciser latency calculations (#3088)
4eb84e9 
-CXL Host exerciser latency calculations  equation by consider the penalty start i.e.
    B asically consider total clock cycles – penalty clock cycles for calculation instead of total cycles that comes in DSM.

    Latency nano seconds  =  (number of ticks – penalty start ticks ) * 2.5

Signed-off-by: anandaravuri <ananda.ravuri@intel.com>
anandaravuri added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2024
@anandaravuri
fix: update CXL Host exerciser latency calculations (#3088) (#3089)
707ab31 
-CXL Host exerciser latency calculations  equation by consider the penalty start i.e.
    B asically consider total clock cycles – penalty clock cycles for calculation instead of total cycles that comes in DSM.

    Latency nano seconds  =  (number of ticks – penalty start ticks ) * 2.5

Signed-off-by: anandaravuri <ananda.ravuri@intel.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pcolberg pcolberg pcolberg approved these changes

@fpgamatt fpgamatt Awaiting requested review from fpgamatt

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@anandaravuri @coveralls @pcolberg