Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Batch backports to 5.0.x #5940

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

jlucovsky
Copy link
Contributor

Continuation of #5939
Batch backports to 5.0.x

Describe changes:

Updates

  • Fixes build issue .

#suricata-verify-pr:
#suricata-verify-repo:
#suricata-verify-branch:
#suricata-update-pr:
#suricata-update-repo:
#suricata-update-branch:
#libhtp-pr:
#libhtp-repo:
#libhtp-branch:

jasonish and others added 3 commits February 24, 2021 14:24
Move initialization of filestore global counter to PreRunInit,
so they get registered during program initialization, or as
required in unix-socket mode, initialized for each file run.

Fixes Redmine issue:
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/4216

(cherry picked from commit 7f1e574)
so as to avoid overrecursion leading to stack exhaustion

(cherry picked from commit 7500c29)
@jlucovsky jlucovsky requested a review from a team as a code owner February 27, 2021 15:57
@jlucovsky jlucovsky mentioned this pull request Feb 27, 2021
@jlucovsky jlucovsky changed the title Batch bacports to 5.0.x Batch backports to 5.0.x Mar 2, 2021
@jlucovsky jlucovsky closed this Mar 2, 2021
@jlucovsky jlucovsky deleted the backports-5.0.x/3 branch March 2, 2021 13:09
jufajardini added a commit to jufajardini/suricata that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2023
Defrag memcap and flow memcap do not support flow action for the
exception policies, as there is no flow when the exception condition is
hit. In such cases, the exception policy must be considered for the
packet only, when that makes sense, or should be ignored, in case of
`bypass`.

Bug OISF#5940
jufajardini added a commit to jufajardini/suricata that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2023
As flow.memcap-policy and defrag.memcap-policy do not support flow
actions, clarify that in the documentation. Also fix some typos, and
add missing values in some places where the exception policies were
explained.

Related to
Bug OISF#5940
jufajardini added a commit to jufajardini/suricata that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2023
Defrag memcap and flow memcap do not support flow action for the
exception policies, as there is no flow when the exception condition is
hit. In such cases, the exception policy must be considered for the
packet only, when that makes sense, or should be ignored, in case of
`bypass`.

Bug OISF#5940
jufajardini added a commit to jufajardini/suricata that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2023
As flow.memcap-policy and defrag.memcap-policy do not support flow
actions, clarify that in the documentation. Also fix some typos, and
add missing values in some places where the exception policies were
explained.

Related to
Bug OISF#5940
jufajardini added a commit to jufajardini/suricata that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2023
Defrag memcap and flow memcap do not support flow action for the
exception policies, as there is no flow when the exception condition is
hit. In such cases, the exception policy must be considered for the
packet only, when that makes sense, or should be ignored, in case of
`bypass`.

Bug OISF#5940
jufajardini added a commit to jufajardini/suricata that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2023
As flow.memcap-policy and defrag.memcap-policy do not support flow
actions, clarify that in the documentation. Also fix some typos, and
add missing values in some places where the exception policies were
explained.

Related to
Bug OISF#5940
jufajardini added a commit to jufajardini/suricata that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2023
Defrag memcap and flow memcap do not support flow action for the
exception policies, as there is no flow when the exception condition is
hit. In such cases, the exception policy must be considered for the
packet only, when that makes sense, or should be ignored, in case of
`bypass`.

Bug OISF#5940
jufajardini added a commit to jufajardini/suricata that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2023
As flow.memcap-policy and defrag.memcap-policy do not support flow
actions, clarify that in the documentation. Also fix some typos, and
add missing values in some places where the exception policies were
explained.

Related to
Bug OISF#5940
victorjulien pushed a commit to victorjulien/suricata that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2023
Defrag memcap and flow memcap do not support flow action for the
exception policies, as there is no flow when the exception condition is
hit. In such cases, the exception policy must be considered for the
packet only, when that makes sense, or should be ignored, in case of
`bypass`.

Bug OISF#5940
victorjulien pushed a commit to victorjulien/suricata that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2023
As flow.memcap-policy and defrag.memcap-policy do not support flow
actions, clarify that in the documentation. Also fix some typos, and
add missing values in some places where the exception policies were
explained.

Related to
Bug OISF#5940
jufajardini added a commit to jufajardini/suricata that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2023
Defrag memcap and flow memcap do not support flow action for the
exception policies, as there is no flow when the exception condition is
hit. In such cases, the exception policy must be considered for the
packet only, when that makes sense, or should be ignored, in case of
`bypass`.

Bug OISF#5940

(cherry picked from commit d4333fb)
jufajardini added a commit to jufajardini/suricata that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2023
As flow.memcap-policy and defrag.memcap-policy do not support flow
actions, clarify that in the documentation. Also fix some typos, and
add missing values in some places where the exception policies were
explained.

Related to
Bug OISF#5940

(cherry picked from commit 31066c7)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
3 participants