Backports bytejump 6.0.15/v1 #9556
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
inashivb
force-pushed
the
backports-bytejump-6.0.15/v1
branch
from
8a19277
to
b86ae72
Compare
Issue: 4624 Change the function signature of byte-jump's domatch from an int to a bool to avoid ambiguity handling return values. (cherry picked from commit 27a6655)
Issue: 4624 Handle negative post_offset values that jump before the buffer as though they refer to the buffer start. (cherry picked from commit 2bf9d0f)
inashivb
force-pushed
the
backports-bytejump-6.0.15/v1
branch
from
b86ae72
to
9ef1b0c
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Link to redmine ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/6377
SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#1410