Clamp nodes and edges #20
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Cleaning up the graph makes sense. It's also good practice to record data manipulation, governing assumptions, and related methodology somewhere. Maybe some sort of explainer box or a simple click through from a "Info on our methodology" link. Not sure how that fits into the UI, but something to consider. May not be possible for this hackathon, but just putting it out there as a future data transparency move. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I drilled down in this PR as to why we see so many orphan authors. It turns out that in the process of creating edges and inference the total number of authors goes down because some of them didn't write a paper while at one of the 5 institutions. I think it cleans up the graph a bit, we could try to display a couple of more institutions. Wdyt @lewlefton ?