.NET target 5.0 and 6.0 use 6.0 version of Microsoft.Extensions.Loggi…

[mcyborg]

…ng.Abstractions

Referencing package OPCFoundation.NetStandard.Opc.Ua.Core from a .NET6 targeted project that in it self are using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions 6.0.4 will cause downgrade problems.

Instead for .NET6 targeted applications reference 6.0.x versions of Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions.

Proposed changes

Describe the changes here to communicate to the maintainers why we should accept this pull request. If it fixes a bug or resolves a feature request, be sure to link to that issue.

Related Issues

• Fixes #

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce?
Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR.

• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Test enhancement (non-breaking change to increase test coverage)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected, requires version increase of Nuget packages)
• Documentation Update (if none of the other choices apply)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc.
• I have signed the CLA.
• I ran tests locally with my changes, all passed.
• I fixed all failing tests in the CI pipelines.
• I fixed all introduced issues with CodeQL and LGTM.
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works and increased code coverage.
• I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate).
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules.

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (88f2592) 58.98% compared to head (0b25961) 58.90%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2335      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   58.98%   58.90%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         331      331              
  Lines       64141    64141              
==========================================
- Hits        37836    37785      -51     
- Misses      26305    26356      +51     

see 12 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.