Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[testing] sequential running for flow #2723

Draft
wants to merge 94 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

GitPaean
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@GitPaean GitPaean force-pushed the hnil_sequential_august branch 4 times, most recently from 06b0b24 to 62753e2 Compare August 12, 2020 21:23
@GitPaean
Copy link
Member Author

jenkins build this please

1 similar comment
@GitPaean
Copy link
Member Author

jenkins build this please

@GitPaean
Copy link
Member Author

jenkins build this opm-models=624 please

@GitPaean
Copy link
Member Author

jenkins build this opm-models=624 please

1 similar comment
@GitPaean
Copy link
Member Author

jenkins build this opm-models=624 please

@GitPaean
Copy link
Member Author

It looks like jenkins did not catch all the commits in OPM/opm-models#624 .

@GitPaean
Copy link
Member Author

jenkins build this opm-models=624 please

@GitPaean
Copy link
Member Author

there is some bug in the Jenkins script. It could not get the latest commit from the opm-models.

GitPaean and others added 27 commits August 21, 2020 22:23
when there is no pressuresolver.json file is provided.
to make sure we have the consistent information when calculating
relative change for time step calculation.
…t border with derivative with respect to rs.

- corrected update chopping sT
- added asserts
- output of iterarations to scrren
- commented line on alternative inital guess for transport
- skip well switching in transport
and adding DIR to the test for flow_blackoil_dunecpr_seq
from different functions.

It only happens during the sequential solution.

This is to recover the running with flow.
It looks like not used and might be able to do different way with the
added inner iteration for StandardWell.
removing the things not needed.
blackoilprimaryvariables.hh. Preparing for refactoring.
the fuction assignNaive does not work, need to adjust more.
against blackoilintensivequantities.hh, preparing for the possible
refactoring.
it looks like there are only a few lines different from BlackOilNewtonMethod
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants