You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This ticket documents actions taken after a query was made regarding certain edits in Mindanao , alleging derived data from an incompatible source, and questions about accuracy.
We reached out to the contributor who obliged by disclosing their workflow and sources used for said edits. We concur with Maning's takeaways, that some data is derived from the Philippine Statistical Authority geodata, without which, it would be impossible for them to determine said places and their respective locations.
Their other edits in the same changeset, those locations extrapolated from OSMaPaaralan data, where DepEd permission was granted to publish their 2013 dataset, can remain in OSM.
Under section 176 of the Republic Act 8293, Philippine government data are ineligible for copyright - are considered "public domain" -- but prior permission is required for commercial use. This explicitly opposes the OSM license, that offers unrestricted use, and only requiring OSM attribution. Hence, they should not be added in OpenStreetMap unless informed consent has been granted by the data owners, and they agree to publish the data in OSM under the terms of the ODbL, explicitly waiving off the government's terms on commercial use under said act.
After #67, and #69 incident, there's a pressing need to create clearer guidelines for volunteers who are interested in contributing data (or derived data) from sources other than themselves (e.g. proprietary data, data from government, data from work/projects, etc.)
This ticket documents actions taken after a query was made regarding certain edits in Mindanao , alleging derived data from an incompatible source, and questions about accuracy.
We reached out to the contributor who obliged by disclosing their workflow and sources used for said edits. We concur with Maning's takeaways, that some data is derived from the Philippine Statistical Authority geodata, without which, it would be impossible for them to determine said places and their respective locations.
Their other edits in the same changeset, those locations extrapolated from OSMaPaaralan data, where DepEd permission was granted to publish their 2013 dataset, can remain in OSM.
Under section 176 of the Republic Act 8293, Philippine government data are ineligible for copyright - are considered "public domain" -- but prior permission is required for commercial use. This explicitly opposes the OSM license, that offers unrestricted use, and only requiring OSM attribution. Hence, they should not be added in OpenStreetMap unless informed consent has been granted by the data owners, and they agree to publish the data in OSM under the terms of the ODbL, explicitly waiving off the government's terms on commercial use under said act.
After #67, and #69 incident, there's a pressing need to create clearer guidelines for volunteers who are interested in contributing data (or derived data) from sources other than themselves (e.g. proprietary data, data from government, data from work/projects, etc.)
Actions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: