You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Shall we impose CF and ACDD-1.3? I have a strong opinion that OG-1.0 must qualify for both CF-1.8 and ACDD-1.3, i.e. everything that we define on OG should comply with CF and ACDD. But let's consider a scenario where someone adds some extra information, which could be an attribute or something else. Since it is a piece of extra information, it shouldn't break with OG, but since CF and ACDD are broader standards, that new addition could violate CF and ACDD. Shall we allow for that freedom? I don't see a good reason today to violate CF and ACDD, but it might be convenient to leave us such room for the future. If down the road, a new convention is proposed to replace the ACDD, let's call it ACDD-pro. With this modification, it could be possible to OG conform with both at the same time.
The question is: Should OG conform with CF-1.8 and ACDD-1.3 without explicitly requiring those conventions, giving more flexibility for future decisions?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Shall we impose CF and ACDD-1.3? I have a strong opinion that OG-1.0 must qualify for both CF-1.8 and ACDD-1.3, i.e. everything that we define on OG should comply with CF and ACDD. But let's consider a scenario where someone adds some extra information, which could be an attribute or something else. Since it is a piece of extra information, it shouldn't break with OG, but since CF and ACDD are broader standards, that new addition could violate CF and ACDD. Shall we allow for that freedom? I don't see a good reason today to violate CF and ACDD, but it might be convenient to leave us such room for the future. If down the road, a new convention is proposed to replace the ACDD, let's call it ACDD-pro. With this modification, it could be possible to OG conform with both at the same time.
The question is: Should OG conform with CF-1.8 and ACDD-1.3 without explicitly requiring those conventions, giving more flexibility for future decisions?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions