Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check for each nREPL port file at each tree level #317

Closed
Olical opened this issue Feb 17, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #324
Closed

Check for each nREPL port file at each tree level #317

Olical opened this issue Feb 17, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #324
Labels
client-clojure enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Olical
Copy link
Owner

Olical commented Feb 17, 2022

As Hukka over on Clojurians slack pointed out, Conjure will pick the Clojure .nrepl-port file over the shadow-cljs one if a single .nrepl-port exists anywhere up your directory tree, so it's hunting for that first then shadow-cljs if it can't find one. It should instead check each directory for each file in priority order.

The priority remains the same (Clojure then ClojureScript) but it should check for each in each directory as it travels, instead of travelling upwards twice.

@stelcodes
Copy link
Contributor

Hi there @Olical, I'm not sure if you've already been working on this but I posted a rough draft PR for this issue.

stelcodes added a commit to stelcodes/conjure that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2022
stelcodes added a commit to stelcodes/conjure that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2022
stelcodes added a commit to stelcodes/conjure that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2022
stelcodes added a commit to stelcodes/conjure that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2022
stelcodes added a commit to stelcodes/conjure that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2022
@Olical Olical closed this as completed Apr 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client-clojure enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants