Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

V5 resolve request permission #936

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 9, 2023
Merged

Conversation

nan-li
Copy link
Contributor

@nan-li nan-li commented Nov 6, 2023

Description

One Line Summary

Resolve the correct boolean for the requestPermission method when permission denied, and resolve correctly if permission is already granted.

Details

Resolve correct boolean when permission denied

  • We were only resolving the call when r.getData() is true. This meant we only resolved when the prompt receives an accept response.
  • Instead r.getData() itself is the response to the Promise

Resolve request permission call when permission already exists

Problem:
If permission is already enabled, the native call to OneSignal.getNotifications().requestPermission(fallbackToSettings, Continue.with(...) never suspends and the Continuation code block never runs. As a result, we would not be able to resolve the promise over the bridge.

Solution:
Before calling that method, do a permission check and return true early.

Motivation

Resolve calls to request permission correctly so app code doesn't hang.

Testing

Unit testing

None

Manual testing

Android emulator API 33

  • Tested the boolean returned when permission is accepted and denied and it returns true and false respectively.
  • Tested combinations of toggling permissions in app settings and calls to requestPermission.

Affected code checklist

  • Notifications
    • Display
    • Open
    • Push Processing
    • Confirm Deliveries
  • Outcomes
  • Sessions
  • In-App Messaging
  • REST API requests
  • Public API changes

Checklist

Overview

  • I have filled out all REQUIRED sections above
  • PR does one thing
    • If it is hard to explain how any codes changes are related to each other then it most likely needs to be more than one PR
  • Any Public API changes are explained in the PR details and conform to existing APIs

Testing

  • I have included test coverage for these changes, or explained why they are not needed
  • All automated tests pass, or I explained why that is not possible
  • I have personally tested this on my device, or explained why that is not possible

Final pass

  • Code is as readable as possible.
    • Simplify with less code, followed by splitting up code into well named functions and variables, followed by adding comments to the code.
  • I have reviewed this PR myself, ensuring it meets each checklist item
    • WIP (Work In Progress) is ok, but explain what is still in progress and what you would like feedback on. Start the PR title with "WIP" to indicate this.

This change is Reviewable

* We were only resolving the call when `r.getData()` is true. This meant we only resolved when the prompt receives an accept response.
* Instead `r.getData()` itself is the response to the Promise
Problem:
If permission is already enabled, the native call to `OneSignal.getNotifications().requestPermission(fallbackToSettings, Continue.with(...)` never suspends and the Continuation code block never runs. As a result, we would not be able to resolve the promise over the bridge.

Solution:
Before calling that method, do a permission check and return true early.
@nan-li nan-li merged commit f395403 into user_model/main Nov 9, 2023
3 checks passed
@nan-li nan-li deleted the v5_resolve_request_permission branch November 9, 2023 19:38
@jennantilla jennantilla mentioned this pull request Nov 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants