Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test Reviewer customisation with a private github app #4

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Onigam
Copy link
Owner

@Onigam Onigam commented Jan 19, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor: Enhanced GitHub Actions workflow for improved security and maintainability.
  • Refactor: Updated Commenter class for increased readability in source code.

These changes optimize the review job in the GitHub Actions workflow and improve the structure of the Commenter class, resulting in a more secure, efficient, and maintainable codebase.

@larrytechlead
Copy link

larrytechlead bot commented Jan 19, 2024

Image description CodeRabbit

Walkthrough

The changes include updating the GitHub Actions workflow for the review job, generating an installation token, and modifying the Commenter class in src/commenter.ts. These updates aim to improve security, readability, and maintainability of the code.

Changes

File(s) Summary
.github/workflows/ai-pr-review.yml GitHub Actions workflow updated for the review job, introducing a new step to generate an installation token using tibdex/github-app-token action.
src/commenter.ts Commenter class modified to construct a comment's body using a template literal, enhancing readability and maintainability.

Copy link

@larrytechlead larrytechlead bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Image description CodeRabbit

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 04040db and 8db68b0 commits.
Files selected (1)
  • .github/workflows/ai-pr-review.yml (1)
Review comments generated (2)
  • Review: 1
  • LGTM: 1

Tips

Chat with Image description CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)

  • Reply on review comments left by this bot to ask follow-up questions. A review comment is a comment on a diff or a file.
  • Invite the bot into a review comment chain by tagging @coderabbitai in a reply.

Code suggestions

  • The bot may make code suggestions, but please review them carefully before committing since the line number ranges may be misaligned.
  • You can edit the comment made by the bot and manually tweak the suggestion if it is slightly off.

Pausing incremental reviews

  • Add @coderabbitai: ignore anywhere in the PR description to pause further reviews from the bot.

.github/workflows/ai-pr-review.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@larrytechlead larrytechlead bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Image description CodeRabbit

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8db68b0 and 1d1066f commits.
Files selected (2)
  • .github/workflows/ai-pr-review.yml (1)
  • src/commenter.ts (1)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/commenter.ts
Review comments generated (2)
  • Review: 1
  • LGTM: 1

Tips

Chat with Image description CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)

  • Reply on review comments left by this bot to ask follow-up questions. A review comment is a comment on a diff or a file.
  • Invite the bot into a review comment chain by tagging @coderabbitai in a reply.

Code suggestions

  • The bot may make code suggestions, but please review them carefully before committing since the line number ranges may be misaligned.
  • You can edit the comment made by the bot and manually tweak the suggestion if it is slightly off.

Pausing incremental reviews

  • Add @coderabbitai: ignore anywhere in the PR description to pause further reviews from the bot.

@Onigam Onigam changed the title Ci/darwig app as reviewer Test Reviewer customisation with a github app Jan 22, 2024
Copy link

@larrytechlead larrytechlead bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Image description CodeRabbit

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 04040db and 1d1066f commits.
Files selected (2)
  • .github/workflows/ai-pr-review.yml (1)
  • src/commenter.ts (1)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/commenter.ts
Review comments generated (2)
  • Review: 1
  • LGTM: 1

Tips

Chat with Image description CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)

  • Reply on review comments left by this bot to ask follow-up questions. A review comment is a comment on a diff or a file.
  • Invite the bot into a review comment chain by tagging @coderabbitai in a reply.

Code suggestions

  • The bot may make code suggestions, but please review them carefully before committing since the line number ranges may be misaligned.
  • You can edit the comment made by the bot and manually tweak the suggestion if it is slightly off.

Pausing incremental reviews

  • Add @coderabbitai: ignore anywhere in the PR description to pause further reviews from the bot.

Comment on lines +24 to 31
- name: Generate installation token
id: generate-token
uses: tibdex/github-app-token@v1
with:
app_id: 800935
private_key: ${{ secrets.CODE_REVIEW_APP_PRIVATE_KEY }}
installation_id: 46310774
- name: AI PR Reviewer
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Image description CodeRabbit

This hunk introduces a new step to generate an installation token using the tibdex/github-app-token action. This change enhances security by replacing the usage of the GITHUB_TOKEN with a generated token specific to the GitHub App and installation.

The new step passes essential parameters such as the app ID, private key, and installation ID to the tibdex/github-app-token action. The generated token is then utilized in the AI PR Reviewer step as the GITHUB_TOKEN.

24:       - name: Generate installation token
25:         id: generate-token
26:         uses: tibdex/github-app-token@v1
27:         with:
28:           app_id: 800935
29:           private_key: ${{ secrets.CODE_REVIEW_APP_PRIVATE_KEY }}
30:           installation_id: 46310774
31:        - name: AI PR Reviewer
32:          uses: Onigam/ai-mistral-pr-reviewer@v0.7
33:          env:
34:           GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ steps.generate-token.outputs.token }}

@Onigam Onigam changed the title Test Reviewer customisation with a github app Test Reviewer customisation with a private github app Jan 22, 2024
@@ -21,10 +21,17 @@ jobs:
review:
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@coderabbitai write me a summary of this pull request here

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Image description CodeRabbit

@Onigam Here's the summary for the pull request:

This pull request introduces changes to the .github/workflows/ai-pr-review.yml file, enhancing security and maintainability. A new step has been added to generate an installation token using the tibdex/github-app-token action. This token is then utilized in the AI PR Reviewer step as the GITHUB_TOKEN, replacing the usage of the GITHUB_TOKEN.

Additionally, the src/commenter.ts file has been updated to modify the Commenter class. The construction of a comment's body has been altered using a template literal, improving readability and maintainability.

These changes improve the security of the codebase by replacing the GITHUB_TOKEN with a generated token. The modifications in src/commenter.ts lead to more readable and maintainable code.

For further information, please refer to the detailed summary provided in the PR description.

Best,
coderabbitai

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant