New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
<ons-pull-hook> as a direct descendant of <ons-scroller> seem not correct #707
Comments
I add the style |
Thanks @zack24q ! We will check this out. If this solves the bug, don't hesitate to create a PR with the changes. |
OK, I will. |
argelius
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 5, 2015
Fix for ons-scroller and ons-carousel. Closes #707
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
I put "ons-pull-hook" as a direct descendant of "ons-page", it works fine. But when i need to put "ons-pull-hook" in "ons-scroller", it seem not correct. Here is my operation,first i scroll the list to the bottom, so the list's postion is bottom, then i scroll the list up with mouse(not wheel), the “pull-to-refresh” behavior has been triggered. I think the “pull-to-refresh” behavior should be triggered only the list's postion is top. please see my codepen. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: