Retrait du mot libre dans l'intro du readme #36
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Retrait du terme libre pour éviter dans l'idée où cela doit être implicite que le contenu de la brique est en libre accès.
La gratuité n'est pas forcément intuitive et les gens vont certainement se demander comment cela fonctionne économiquement.
Il me semble intéressant de faire une section pour parler davantage du fonctionnement économique (potentiel, vu que pour le moment il n'y a pas d'argent).
À voir comment cela évolue, mais l'idée pour le moment est de permettre à des personnes indépendantes de mener une activités grâce aux modèles ouverts, par exemple faire de l'éducation, tout en contribuant à la ressource comme outil de travail.