Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[csharp-netcore] Better handling of oneOf/anyOf with duplicated data type #15377

Merged
merged 5 commits into from May 5, 2023

Conversation

wing328
Copy link
Member

@wing328 wing328 commented May 2, 2023

  • Better handling of oneOf/anyOf with duplicated data type
  • add tests
  • remove skipOneOfAnyOfGetter option as it's no longer needed

to fix #14350

cc @OpenAPITools/generator-core-team

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
  • Run the following to build the project and update samples:
    ./mvnw clean package 
    ./bin/generate-samples.sh
    ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh
    
    Commit all changed files.
    This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
    These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
    You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
    For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH.
  • In case you are adding a new generator, run the following additional script :
    ./bin/utils/ensure-up-to-date.sh
    
    Commit all changed files.
  • File the PR against the correct branch: master (6.3.0) (minor release - breaking changes with fallbacks), 7.0.x (breaking changes without fallbacks)
  • If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

cc @mandrean (2017/08) @frankyjuang (2019/09) @shibayan (2020/02) @Blackclaws (2021/03) @lucamazzanti (2021/05)

@wing328 wing328 added this to the 6.6.0 milestone May 2, 2023
@wing328 wing328 marked this pull request as ready for review May 2, 2023 04:42
@devhl-labs
Copy link
Contributor

Here is a pr to this branch that will remove the extra spaces and also fixes a serialization issue.
#15413

@wing328
Copy link
Member Author

wing328 commented May 4, 2023

merged :)

@wing328 wing328 merged commit 7259d81 into master May 5, 2023
76 of 77 checks passed
@wing328 wing328 deleted the fix-duplicated-method branch May 11, 2023 04:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG][csharp-netcore] Duplicate methods in model class
2 participants