fix parameters_to_url_query returns booleans with upper letter

[mhaley-tignis]

PR checklist

• Read the contribution guidelines.
• Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
• Run the following to build the project and update samples:

  ./mvnw clean package 
  ./bin/generate-samples.sh ./bin/configs/*.yaml
  ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh
  

  Commit all changed files.
  This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
  These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
  You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
  For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH.
• File the PR against the correct branch: master (upcoming 7.1.0 minor release - breaking changes with fallbacks), 8.0.x (breaking changes without fallbacks)
• If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

[mhaley-tignis]

Fix for #16941

[mhaley-tignis]

@cbornet @tomplus @krjakbrjak @fa0311 @multani

[mhaley-tignis]

In python boolean is a subclass of int so isinstance(True, (int, float)) == True. We need to check if the type is boolean before checking if the type is a number to get the behaviour we desire.

[multani]

In python boolean is a subclass of int so isinstance(True, (int, float)) == True. We need to check if the type is boolean before checking if the type is a number to get the behaviour we desire.

TIL it's still the case in Python 3, I thought this was only the case in 2.x 👍

[wing328]

@mhaley-tignis thanks for the PR. Can you please take a look at the test failure when you've time?

[mhaley-tignis]

@mhaley-tignis thanks for the PR. Can you please take a look at the test failure when you've time?

whoops, yes, missed that &, see f6da174

[mhaley-tignis]

ok @wing328, should be good now. I rushed this and didn't really look at the exception the first time. Sorry about that!

[wing328]

no need to sorry and thanks for your PR to improve the Python client generator.

[multani]

Looks good to me, thanks for the fix @mhaley-tignis !